President Obama’s speech at the UN on September 25 amplified the urgent need to confront Iran’s nuclear program. In an effort to project American strength on the issue, President Obama made the following statement:
“A nuclear-armed Iran … would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty. That’s why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable. And that’s why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
Iran’s rapid development of fissile nuclear material is a complex issue. The transition from conventional contemporary weapons to nuclear weapons has grave implications for the existence of the State of Israel; the potential for nuclear proliferation, including possession of a nuclear weapon by terrorist organizations; a severe oil shortage; and the degradation of the global ecosystem.
Iran’s ability to acquire a nuclear weapon is a manifestation of nuclear proliferation. It tells us that the concept of an effective international non-proliferation regime is a marvelous idea that, based on the statements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has not prevented Iran from moving rapidly toward a nuclear capability. What is complicating the process? How can the international community change course? (more…)