June 28, 2012
With the European summit on June 28-29, all eyes are on this meeting as the leaders address their region’s deteriorating economic crisis. Can the European Union be saved? Is there even a sense of European community to save?
Endy Zemenides, a National Strategy Forum Review Editorial Board member, discusses the problem of solidarity among the European states and why the lack of solidarity is impeding a quick solution to the economic crisis. The ability for Europe to solidify around a common cause will have broad repercussions for U.S. national security.
Read Is There a Europe to be Saved? by Endy Zemenides at the Huffington Post.
June 25, 2012
New Publication Now Online: Evaluation of the 2012 Chicago NATO Summit
The 2012 Chicago NATO Summit was a significant event for the City of Chicago, the U.S., and for the Transatlantic Alliance. On the agenda were a number of important issues affecting global security and the future of the transatlantic relationship. Some of these were addressed substantively, others were glossed over. In both cases, the implications of the Summit have profound effects on international relations and U.S. national security.
This special issue of the National Strategy Forum Review (NSFR) evaluates the 2012 Chicago NATO Summit on the basis of what was on the agenda, what agreements and policies were produced during the Summit, and what the consequences of these policies will be in the future. NATO affiliates and NSFR Editorial Board Members have evaluated these criteria in the first section, titled “Evaluation of the 2012 Chicago NATO Summit.” For the past several years, the National Strategy Forum has developed a close working relationship with the Northwestern Medill School of Journalism National Security Journalism Initiative that is funded, in part, by generous assistance from the McCormick Foundation. In the second section, titled “Key Issues for NATO,” advanced graduate school journalism students from Medill were assigned to do first-hand interviews with NATO participants and stakeholders, and have provided reports on many of the complex issues facing NATO after the Summit.
Looking back on the May summit, much was accomplished, but there were opportunities that were missed and there are several negative implications for the future. The articles herein provide the reader with the playbook for analyzing these issues and arriving at their own conclusions.
To access this new NSFR Special Edition, please visit the link here.
June 14, 2012
A new article by NSF Editorial Board Member Frank Schell, featured in The American Spectator: “From India With Unrequited Love.”
“Deep within the psyche of America is the desire to be loved. Never a colonial power in the traditional sense, and with a New World cheerfulness unlike the cynicism of so-called Old Europe, America predictably seeks to provide aid monies, investment capital, cultural exchanges, armaments, goodwill, and in the case of India — even nuclear fuel and civilian reactors. While America has a vested interest in making these offerings to ensure a benign world order, at times we are perplexed when generosity is not met with warm display…”
Please visit the following link to read the rest of the article “From India With Unrequited Love.”
May 18, 2012
The May 17, 2012 discussion between the anti-NATO and pro-NATO perspectives during the Chicago NATO 2012 Summit weekend was held at the Pritzker Military Library in downtown Chicago. The live webcast is now archived at the YouTube link below. The theme for the webcast was “Social Responsibility and National Security: Towards a New NATO”.
May 17, 2012
The National Strategy Forum is hosting a live, public discussion between the anti-NATO protestors and the pro-NATO position in a webcast event from the Pritzker Military Library on May 17th at 6PM CST. Information about the event and how to access the live (and later archived) webcast can be found in the press release here. The event is by RSVP only, but the public can view the webcast online.
The webcast theme is: “Social Responsibility and National Security: Towards a New NATO”
The webcast can be viewed by accessing the following link: www.pritzkermilitarylibrary.org
May 9, 2012
This special edition of the National Strategy Forum Review (NSFR) addresses the local, national, and international implications of the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago. The confluence of these three parts creates the rationale for this combined issue of the NSFR. The articles herein are a guidebook to the global relevance of the G8 and NATO Summits in May 2012, and to the ramifications of these events to Chicago and U.S. security in the future.
The publication has three interrelated parts:
On the local level, the City of Chicago has prepared to implement a security and marketing campaign for a secure and successful Summit. Chicago hopes to leverage this historic event into tangible benefits for the City. Meanwhile, Chicago is also addressing many other local security strategy issues the affect the long-term prosperity of the City. These include financial deficits, deteriorating infrastructure, business flight, and physical security concerns. The combination of the new Emanuel administration and the opportunities afforded by the NATO Summit have coalesced at a propitious time to reevaluate Chicago’s multifaceted strategy for its future. The articles in the “Chicago’s Security Strategy” section ask this question: What is the City’s long-term strategy for prospering as a Global City?
On the national level, the G8 and NATO Summits have created discussion regarding the viability and relevance of these institutions. Occupy Wall Street, the Coalition Against NATO and G8, and other movements have raised concerns about these organizations’ roles in global affairs. Public vetting of these voices is an important part of the democratic process. At the same time, some of the issues raised – including the financial, foreign policy, and social justice concerns – relate directly to U.S. national security. The articles in the “Social Justice, NATO, and International Security” section ask: Why are NATO and the G8 relevant (or perhaps irrelevant) to U.S. national security?
On the international level, the G8 and NATO organizations are pillars of the global architecture. They help to form the backbone of international economics, global security, and humanitarian aid. Yet much of what these organizations do remain unclear to the public sector. The articles in “The G8 and NATO Summits” section ask: What are the major issues facing these organizations at their respective events in May?
The Winter-Spring 2012 Special Edition is now available online at the link here. The entire issue is also available as a PDF download at the link here.
March 22, 2012
In May 2012, leaders of the Group of 8 (G8) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries are descending on Camp David and Chicago respectively to discuss pressing issues of global governance and international security. These meetings will have broad policy effects on their respective fields. To prepare for the following summit meetings, the National Strategy Forum Review is providing a background briefing on these two organizations to discuss their institutional histories and contemporary relevance to global governance.
What are the institutional histories of these institutions? Why are they relevant and important to global affairs? What issues will be discussed during these summits? To read the article, click on the link below.
Briefing: The 2012 G8 and NATO Summits
By Eric S. Morse
February 16, 2012
Strategic cooperation in the Arctic is an important issue for U.S.-Canada relations. The region is a vital source of natural ocean resources and global transportation, one that is often contentious for the complicated international interests in its strategic potential. Managing these contentious issues is the subject of a new, excellent report by the Center of Strategic and International Studies, A New Security Architecture for the Arctic.
The National Strategy Forum Review published an issue dedicated to the U.S.-Canada relationship in the Summer of 2010. The publication covers a number of U.S.-Canada security issues, but two articles in particular addressed the Arctic. To read this issue, visit Canada: The Other Special Relationship.
January 25, 2012
The case for American leadership in the Iran nuclear crisis has gained focus lately. It is becoming clearer that strong U.S. leadership is the predicate for coordinated multilateral engagement on the Iranian nuclear issue. An effective sanctions campaign against Iran’s nuclear program has been impeded in the past by lack of strategic focus and the complexity international relations. This is not time for the U.S. to lead from behind.
A member of the NSF Editorial Board, recently published a commentary on the subject at The American Spectator.
The American Spectator: Don’t Waste Another Crisis, Mr. President
By Frank Schell
December 9, 2011
The U.S.-China relationship is the most important international relationship today. Our countries are linked economically and the security and stability of the international system depends on actions that we take collectively or unilaterally. However, greater friction is occurring today as a result of China’s rise and the decrease of U.S. supremacy abroad. Neither sees eye to eye on many important international issues, and the prospects for cooperation and rapprochement are strained.
The National Strategy Forum Review has published a report about the status of the U.S.-China relationship. We compiled a series of interviews with our contacts in Beijing and Shanghai, and have synthesized the substance of these discussions into a report about China’s strategic objectives and the means to improve the U.S.-China relationship. This report serves as a baseline for ongoing discussions with our Chinese counterparts on how to guide the U.S. and China through tense diplomatic waters. Cooperation is not a foregone conclusion, but the U.S. and China must first understand what each other wants before we can accommodate cooperation that is mutually beneficial. We argue that the U.S. and China are bound to compete for influence in the Asia-Pacific, but this competition can be directed in constructive ways if the interactions are based upon established rules of the game. The report, “The U.S.-China Relationship: Building Constructive Competition,” is now available online.
In addition to the report, we asked Drs. Bernard Cole and Cynthia Watson from the National Defense University to discuss China’s military modernization and strategic objectives in East Asia. Their insights are unique and valuable contributions to the discussion. Finally, Mr. Mark Frazzetto wrote a review of Joel Brenner’s new book on cyber security titled, America the Vulnerable.
These articles and the entire issue of the National Strategy Forum Review: Fall 2011, Volume 20, Issue 4 are now available online.